Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 150
Filtrar
1.
J Vis Exp ; (205)2024 Mar 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38557448

RESUMO

Endotracheal intubation and subsequent ventilation are often basic requirements for translational research in rat models for various interventions that require controlled or high ventilation pressures or access to the thoracic cavity and organs. Conventional endoorotracheal intubation using the anatomically existing route through the mouth is well suited for survival experiments. However, this procedure poses some challenges, including generally higher levels of the required experience and technical skill, more advanced equipment, and greater time effort with relevant intubation failure rates and complications such as tracheal perforation, temporary systemic hypooxygenation, and relevant aerial leakage. This manuscript, therefore, presents a detailed step-by-step protocol for endotracheal intubation through tracheotomy in non-survival rat models when guaranteed intubation success, constant oxygenation levels, high ventilation pressures, or open thoracotomy are required. The protocol emphasizes the importance of meticulous surgical technique to ensure consistent and reliable outcomes, especially for researchers who are inexperienced or lack routine in the technique of endoorotracheal intubation via direct laryngoscopy. This procedure is, therefore, expected to minimize animal suffering and unnecessary animal losses.


Assuntos
Toracotomia , Traqueotomia , Animais , Ratos , Intubação Intratraqueal/métodos , Laringoscopia/métodos , Traqueostomia
2.
BJU Int ; 2024 Mar 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38506410

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the nationwide online decision aid 'Entscheidungshilfe Prostatakrebs' (established in 2016, >11.000 users and 60 new users/week) for patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer (PCa), from the perspective of patients and urologists. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To provide personalised information, the tool collects most of the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement standard set, personal preferences, psychological features, and a validated rating of the tool. To evaluate urologists' opinions, we developed a structured two-page questionnaire. All data were collected anonymously. RESULTS: From June 2016 to December 2020, 11 290 patients used the PCa decision aid. Their median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 67 (61-72) years. The median (IQR) time from initial diagnosis to using the tool was 4 (3-7) weeks. In all, 87.7% of users reported high satisfaction. In a multivariable model, predictors for considering observation were higher knowledge, using the decision aid alone, lower oncological risk, normal erectile function, and respective personal preferences. Of 194 urologists, 91 (47%) had implemented the decision aid in their clinical practice. The urologists' mean (SD) satisfaction score (1 'very good'; 6 'unsatisfactory') with it was 1.45 (0.55), and 92% recommended it. Half of the urologists reported time savings. CONCLUSION: Patients and urologists report a very high level of acceptance and satisfaction with this online tool. It offers advantages in shared decision-making and time efficiency. The usage of the decision aid might improve the adoption of active surveillance and watchful waiting when indicated.

3.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 154, 2024 Mar 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38483598

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is an established option in the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Pulse modulation, such as MOSES® technology, has recently been introduced and may offer potential advantages in HoLEP. METHODS: Perioperative data from 117 patients who underwent MOSES® laser enucleation of the prostate (MoLEP) were collected. Propensity score matching using prostate volume, age, body mass index (BMI), and anticoagulant intake was performed using a database of 237 patients treated with HoLEP. In total, 234 patients were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Prostate volume (104 vs. 102 ml), age (70 vs. 71 years), BMI (27 vs. 27), and anticoagulant intake (34 vs. 35%) did not differ significantly between the groups. There were no significant differences in operation time (61.5 vs. 58.1 min, p = 0.42), enucleation efficiency (2.5 vs. 2.6 g/min, p = 0.74), hemostasis time (7.8 vs. 8 min, p = 0.75) and hemoglobin drop (0.9 vs. 0.7 mg/dl, p = 0.48). The complication rates were low in both groups (16.2% for HoLEP and 17.1% for MoLEP). No differences were noted in the Clavien-Dindo Classification (p = 0.63) and the Comprehensive Complication Index (p = 0.24). The rate of complications > CDC IIIa was 0.9% for HoLEP (endoscopic coagulation) and 1.7% for MoLEP (2 cases of endoscopic coagulation). No transfusions were administered. CONCLUSION: Overall, the enucleation efficiency was high in both groups and the procedure time was short. HoLEP is an efficient and safe treatment option in experienced hands, regardless of the use of pulse modulation technology.


Assuntos
Terapia a Laser , Lasers de Estado Sólido , Hiperplasia Prostática , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Hólmio , Pontuação de Propensão , Resultado do Tratamento , Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêutico , Qualidade de Vida , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicações , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata/métodos , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Anticoagulantes
4.
Urologie ; 2024 Feb 05.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38316650

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common solid tumor in men in Germany. Collection of epidemiological and clinical data has been centralized for several years due to legal requirements via the state cancer registries. Thus, the reporting of diagnosis, therapy, and progression of cancer is obligatory in Germany. These data needs to be processed based on the questions of the treating physicians. OBJECTIVES: Intention of this work was to present the development of new cases, disease stages, treatment procedures and prognosis of PCa in Baden-Württemberg (BW). METHODS: For this purpose, data of the cancer registry BW regarding patients with PCa first diagnosed between 2013 and 2021 were evaluated. The evaluation was performed using descriptive statistics, Χ2 test and Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: A total of 84,347 new diagnoses of PCa were reported. Clinical stage was present in 55.3% of patients. Assignment by International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) groups was present in 75.7%. A steady increase in primary diagnosis was evident through 2019. The proportion of primary metastatic disease decreased (2013: 19.6% vs. 2021: 12.0%), and the proportion of localized tumors increased (2013: 65.5% vs. 2021: 77.1%). Radical prostatectomy (RP) dominated the treatment of localized tumors with a mean of 60.1%. The proportion of robot-assisted surgery increased from 23.7% (2013) to 60.8% (2021) with a decrease in the R1 rate from 34.8 to 26.2%. Progression-free survival correlated closely with tumor stage and ISUP group. CONCLUSION: An increase in PCa cases and a decrease of advanced tumors were observed. Treatment was mostly surgical in localized stages, with increasing proportion of robotic-assisted RP. Early diagnosis and treatment are critical for long-term prognosis.

5.
Urol Oncol ; 42(4): 118.e1-118.e7, 2024 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38246807

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of performing 2 consecutive open radical cystectomies (RCs) within 1 day by the same surgical team. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from patients who underwent RC at a single tertiary care center from January 2015 to February 2023. Patient characteristics, perioperative outcomes and endpoints were analyzed. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were created to predict major complications. RESULTS: A total of 657 patients were included in the final cohort, containing 64 paired RCs (32 RC1 and 32 RC2) and 593 single RCs. Major complications occurred in 24.7% of the entire cohort, with no significant differences between single RC vs. RC1 and RC2. Paired RCs showed significantly shorter operative time (OT; p = 0.001) and length of stay (LOS; p = 0.047) compared to single RCs. There were no significant differences in transfusion rates, 30-day readmission, 30-day mortality, or histopathological results between paired and single RCs. Multivariable analysis identified patient characteristics such as age (OR = 1.67, p = 0.03), sex (OR = 0.45, p = 0.008), BMI (OR = 1.98, p = 0.007), ASA-score (OR = 1.61, p = 0.04), and OT (OR = 1.87, p = 0.008) as independent predictors of major complications. CONCLUSION: Performing 2 consecutive open RCs within 1 day by the same surgical team is a safe approach in experienced hands. This strategy optimizes the utilization of surgical resources and addresses the growing demand for urologic care while maintaining high-quality patient care. Preoperative planning should consider patient-specific factors to minimize risks associated with major complications. MICRO ABSTRACT: This study evaluates the outcomes of performing 2 consecutive open radical cystectomies (RC) in a single day by the same surgical team. Data from 657 patients who underwent RC at a single tertiary medical center proved that this approach is safe, with no significant differences in major complications. Preoperative planning should consider patient-specific factors for efficient utilization of surgical resources.


Assuntos
Cistectomia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Humanos , Cistectomia/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Bexiga Urinária
6.
Eur Urol Oncol ; 7(1): 91-97, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37316398

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is no evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN). OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of trial recruitment and to compare surgical outcomes between RAPN and OPN. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: ROBOCOP II was designed as single-center, open-label, feasibility RCT. Patients with suspected localized renal cell carcinoma referred for PN were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to either RAPN or OPN. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary outcome was the feasibility of recruitment, assessed as the accrual rate. Secondary outcomes included perioperative and postoperative data. Data were analyzed descriptively in a modified intention-to-treat population consisting of randomized patients who underwent surgery. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 50 patients underwent RAPN or OPN (accrual rate 65%). In comparison to OPN, RAPN had lower blood loss (OPN 361 ml, standard deviation [SD] 238; RAPN 149 ml, SD 122; difference 212 ml, 95% confidence interval [CI] 105-320; p < 0.001), less need for opioids (OPN 46%; RAPN 16%; difference 30%, 95% CI 5-54; p = 0.024), and fewer complications according to the mean Comprehensive Complication Index (OPN 14, SD 16; RAPN 5, SD 15; difference 9, 95% CI 0-18; p = 0.008). OPN has a shorter operative time (OPN 112 min, SD 29; RAPN 130 min, SD 32; difference -18 min, 95% CI -35 to -1; p = 0.046) and warm ischemia time (OPN 8.7 min, SD 7.1; RAPN 15.4 min, SD 7.0; difference 6.7 min, 95% CI -10.7 to -2.7; p = 0.001). There were no differences between RAPN and OPN regarding postoperative kidney function. CONCLUSIONS: This first RCT comparing OPN and RAPN met the primary outcome of the feasibility of recruitment; however, the window for future RCTs is closing. Each approach has advantages over the other, and both remain safe and effective options. PATIENT SUMMARY: For patients with a kidney tumor, open surgery and robot-assisted keyhole surgery are both feasible and safe approaches for partial removal of the affected kidney. Each approach has known advantages. Long-term follow-up will explore differences in quality of life and cancer control outcomes.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Robótica , Humanos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Nefrectomia/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
7.
Eur Urol Oncol ; 7(1): 53-62, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37543465

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic lymphoceles (SLCs) after transperitoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) are common. Evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on the impact of peritoneal flaps (PFs) on lymphocele (LC) reduction is inconclusive. OBJECTIVE: To show that addition of PFs leads to a reduction of postoperative SLCs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: An investigator-initiated, prospective, parallel, double-blinded, adaptive, phase 3 RCT was conducted. Recruitment took place from September 2019 until December 2021; 6-month written survey-based follow-up was recorded. Stratification was carried out according to potential LC risk factors (extended PLND, diabetes mellitus, and anticoagulation) and surgeons; 1:1 block randomisation was used. Surgeons were informed about allocation after completion of the last surgical step. INTERVENTION: To create PFs, the ventral peritoneum was incised bilaterally and fixated to the pelvic floor. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary endpoint was SLCs. Secondary endpoints included asymptomatic lymphoceles (ALCs), perioperative parameters, and postoperative complications. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: In total, 860 men were screened and 551 randomised. Significant reductions of SLCs (from 9.1% to 3.7%, p = 0.005) and ALCs (27.2% to 10.3%, p < 0.001) over the follow-up period of 6 mo were observed in the intention-to-treat analysis. Operating time was 11 min longer (p < 0.001) in the intervention group; no significant differences in amount (80 vs 103, p = 0.879) and severity (p = 0.182) of postoperative complications (excluding LCs) were observed. The survey-based follow-up might be a limitation. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest RCT evaluating PF creation for LC prevention and met its primary endpoint, the reduction of SLCs. The results were consistent among all subgroup analyses including ALCs. Owing to the subsequent reduction of burden for patients and the healthcare system, establishing PFs should become the new standard of care. PATIENT SUMMARY: A new technique-creation of bilateral peritoneal flaps-was added to the standard procedure of robotic-assisted prostatectomy for lymph node removal. It was safe and decreased lymphocele development, a common postoperative complication and morbidity. Hence, it should become a standard procedure.


Assuntos
Linfocele , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Masculino , Humanos , Linfocele/etiologia , Linfocele/prevenção & controle , Peritônio/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Excisão de Linfonodo/efeitos adversos , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Prostatectomia/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
8.
iScience ; 26(8): 107300, 2023 Aug 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37554463

RESUMO

METTL3 is the major writer of N6-Methyladenosine (m6A) and has been associated with controversial roles in cancer. This is best illustrated in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB), where METTL3 was described to have both oncogenic and tumor-suppressive functions. Here, we reinvestigated the role of METTL3 in UCB. METTL3 knockout reduced the oncogenic phenotype and m6A levels of UCB cell lines. However, complete depletion of METTL3/m6A was not achieved due to selection of cells expressing alternative METTL3 isoforms. Systematic vulnerability and inhibitor response analyses suggested that uroepithelial cells depend on METTL3 for viability. Furthermore, expression and survival analyses of clinical data revealed a complex role for METTL3 in UCB, with decreased m6A mRNA levels in UCB tumors. Our results suggest that METTL3 expression may be a suitable diagnostic UCB biomarker, as the enzyme promotes UCB formation. However, the suitability of the enzyme as a therapeutic target should be evaluated carefully.

9.
Urol Int ; 107(7): 678-683, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37307804

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to investigate and compare clinical safety and efficiency of Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP) and robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) for the treatment of large gland benign prostatic hyperplasia in a tertiary care center. METHODS: Perioperative data of 39 patients who underwent RASP in our institution from 2015 to 2021 was collected. Propensity score matching using prostate volume, patient age, and body mass index (BMI) was performed from a database of 1,100 Patients treated by ThuLEP from 2009 to 2021. A total of 76 patients were matched. Preoperative parameters such as BMI, age, and prostate volume, as well as intra- and postoperative parameters such as operation time, resection weight, transfusion rate, postoperative catheterization time, length of hospital stay (LoS), hemoglobin drop, postoperative urinary retention (PUR), Clavien-Dindo Classification (CDC), and the Combined Complication Index (CCI), were evaluated. RESULTS: There was no difference in mean hemoglobin drop (2.2 vs. 1.9 g/dL, p = 0.34), yet endoscopic surgery showed superiority in mean operation time (109 vs. 154 min, p < 0.001), mean postoperative catheterization time (3.3 vs. 7.2 days, p < 0.001), and mean LOS (5.4 vs. 8.4 days, p < 0.001). Complication rates evaluated by CDC (p = 0.11) and CCI (p = 0.89) were similar in both groups. Within the documented complications, transfusion rate (0 vs. 3, p = 0.08) and the occurrence of PUR (1 vs. 2, p = 0.5) showed no significant difference. CONCLUSION: ThuLEP and RASP show similar perioperative efficacy and a low rate of complications. ThuLEP had shorter operation times, shorter catheterization time, and a shorter LoS.


Assuntos
Terapia a Laser , Lasers de Estado Sólido , Hiperplasia Prostática , Robótica , Masculino , Humanos , Próstata/cirurgia , Túlio , Prostatectomia , Pontuação de Propensão , Terapia a Laser/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêutico , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Hemoglobinas
10.
Urologie ; 62(5): 503-509, 2023 May.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36894689

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although urological specialist practices are central pillars of outpatient care, there is a lack of current data on the care structure of these practices. A description of the structures in large cities versus rural areas as well as gender effects and generational differences is needed not only as a baseline measure for further studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The survey includes data from the physician directory of the Stiftung Gesundheit as well as from the German Medical Association and the Federal Statistical Office. Colleagues were divided into subgroups. Based on the different subgroup sizes, statements about the care structure of outpatient urology in Germany can be made. RESULTS: While the majority of urologists in larger cities work in professional practice groups and care for fewer patients on average, in rural areas there is a particularly high proportion of individual practices with more inhabitants to be cared for per urologist. Female urologists work more frequently in the context of inpatient care. When female urology specialists choose to establish themselves, they are more likely to do so in practice groups and in urban areas. In addition, there is a shift in gender distribution: the younger the age subgroup considered, the higher the proportion of female urologists among all colleagues. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to describe the current structure of outpatient urology care in Germany. Future trends are already emerging that will significantly influence our way of working and the care of patients in the coming years.


Assuntos
Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Doenças Urológicas , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Equidade de Gênero , Alemanha , Prática de Grupo , Doenças Urológicas/diagnóstico , Doenças Urológicas/terapia , Urologistas , Urologia , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
11.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 13(5)2023 Feb 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36899967

RESUMO

To date, only a single transcriptome-wide m6A sequencing study of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) has been reported, with no validation so far. Herein, by TCGA analysis of the KIRC cohort (n = 530 ccRCC; n = 72 normal), an external expression validation of 35 preidentified m6A targets was performed. Further in-depth expression stratification enabled assessment of m6A-driven key targets. Overall survival (OS) analysis and gene set enrichment analyses (GSEA) were conducted to assess their clinical and functional impact on ccRCC. In the hyper-up cluster significant upregulation was confirmed for NDUFA4L2, NXPH4, SAA1, and PLOD2 (40%) and in the hypo-up cluster for FCHSD1 (10%). Significant downregulation was observed for UMOD, ANK3, and CNTFR (27.3%) in the hypo-down cluster and for CHDH (25%) in the hyper-down cluster. In-depth expression stratification showed consistent dysregulation in ccRCC only for 11.67%: NDUFA4L2, NXPH4, and UMOD (NNU-panel). Patients with strong NNU panel dysregulation had significantly poorer OS (p = 0.0075). GSEA identified 13 associated and significantly upregulated gene sets (all p-values < 0.5; FDR < 0.25). External validation of the only available m6A sequencing in ccRCC consistently reduced dysregulated m6A-driven targets on the NNU panel with highly significant effects on OS. Epitranscriptomics are a promising target for developing novel therapies and for identifying prognostic markers for daily clinical practice.

12.
Urol Int ; 107(5): 447-453, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36516804

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) is common in radical prostatectomy (RP). Yet there is no standard recommendation in international guidelines due to poor evidence. It is of great importance that these perioperative AP are sufficiently checked and systemically validated. The objective of this study was to determine whether a "single-shot" (single-use) perioperative AP yields equivalent results compared to a multiday prophylaxis in RP regarding postoperative wound infections and urinary tract infections. METHODS: 376 patients treated by RP at the University Medical Centre Mannheim, from 2014 to 2016, were included in this retrospective study. RP was performed either in a robotic-assisted or open manner. One group received an intravenous dose of perioperative AP with either ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin, continued by an oral dose of AP with ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin until catheter removal, while the other group received a single-shot intravenous perioperative AP with either ciprofloxacin or cefuroxime. RESULTS: There was no significant difference regarding the occurrence of postoperative infections between both AP regimes (p = 0.5). Age, body mass index, and ASA classification did not differ significantly between both groups (p > 0.25). Except for surgery time (p < 0.05), perioperative parameters, such as the preoperative presence of germ-free urine culture, length of hospital stay, catheter time, drain lay time, Gleason score, and TNM stadium, did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION: The present study shows that perioperative single-shot AP does not entail any disadvantage compared to the multiday AP in terms of postoperative infections after RP.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Masculino , Humanos , Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Levofloxacino/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ciprofloxacina , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Prostatectomia/métodos
13.
Anticancer Res ; 43(1): 417-428, 2023 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36585191

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIM: Diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in localized prostate cancer (PC) are insufficient. Treatment stratification relies on prostate-specific antigen, clinical tumor staging and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading, whereas molecular profiling remains unused. Integrins (ITG) have an important function in bidirectional signaling and are associated with progression, proliferation, perineural invasion, angiogenesis, metastasis, neuroendocrine differentiation, and a more aggressive disease phenotype in PC. However, ITG subunit expression in localized PC and their utility as prognostic biomarkers has not yet been analyzed. This study aimed to fill this gap and provide a comprehensive overview of ITG expression as well as ITG utility as biomarkers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) prostate adenocarcinoma cohorts were analyzed regarding ITG expression in correlation to ISUP, N- and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage and were correlated with disease-free survival (DFS). Statistical tests used included the Mann-Whitney U-test, logrank test and uni- and multivariable cox regression analyses. RESULTS: After grouping for ISUP (1 and 2 vs. 3-5), N0 vs. N1 and AJCC stage (≤2 vs. ≥3), multiple ITGs showed significant expression differences. The most consistent results were observed for ITGα4, ITGαX, ITGα11, ITGß2 and ITGα2. In multivariable cox regression, ITGα2, ITGα10, ITGαD, ITGαB2 (TCGA), ITGα11 and ITGß4 (MSKCC) were independent predictors of DFS. CONCLUSION: The utility of ITGs as PC biomarkers was herein shown.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata , Humanos , Masculino , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Estudos de Coortes , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Estadiamento de Neoplasias
14.
Eur Urol Focus ; 9(3): 480-490, 2023 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36529645

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the three approaches of radical cystectomy (robotic assisted [RARC], laparoscopic [LRC], and open [ORC]) have been published recently. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of RCTs comparing RARC, LRC, and ORC, with the primary outcomes being overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and Web of Science (last search: 20/05/2022) was performed. The prospectively registered protocol stated that a NMA of the primary outcomes would be performed only if there was sufficient evidence to compare all three approaches. In case of insufficient evidence, a comparison between the two most common approaches would be performed. The risk of bias and certainty of evidence (CoE) via the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach was assessed for direct evidence and the most common comparison. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Ten trials were identified. There was insufficient evidence for a NMA of all approaches for the primary outcomes. The meta-analysis of RARC and ORC showed no differences in OS (hazard ratio (HR) [confidence interval (CI): 0.98 [0.73-1.30]) and RFS (HR [CI]: 0.99 [0.75-1.31]) with moderate CoE. The secondary outcomes showed lower rates of transfusions (p < 0.01) and longer operating time (p < 0.01) with high CoE for RARC compared with ORC. There were no differences for quality of life, positive margins, length of hospital stay, or major complications (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There are no differences in OS and RFS between RARC and ORC, with moderate CoE. Clinicians should likely apply the approach with which they can reach the highest case volume and in which they have the most experience. PATIENT SUMMARY: We looked at the difference between three types (robotic assisted, laparoscopic, and open) of operating techniques for radical cystectomy. The data showed no significant differences in OS between the robotic-assisted and the open technique, while enough data were not available to make a comparison with conventional laparoscopic surgery.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Humanos , Cistectomia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Metanálise em Rede , Resultado do Tratamento , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Laparoscopia/métodos
15.
Urol Int ; 107(2): 179-185, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36481539

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this randomised prospective trial was to evaluate a novel hands-on endourological training programme (HTP) and compare it to the standard endourological colloquium (SC). METHODS: A new HTP was created based on a sequence of theoretical, video-based, and practical elements emphasising contemporary teaching methods. An existing SC in which live endourological operations were attended served as a comparison. Medical students were enrolled in a ratio of 1:2 (SC:HTP). Objective knowledge questionnaires (5 questions, open answers) and subjective Likert-type questionnaires (rating 1-3 vs. 4-5) were used for evaluation. Primary endpoint was urological knowledge transfer; secondary endpoints were learning effects, progression, and urological interest. RESULTS: 167 students (SC n = 52, HTP n = 115) were included. The knowledge assessment showed a significant increase in knowledge transfer benefitting the HTP on all 5 surveyed items (mean: n = 4/5/4/3/2 vs. n = 2/3/1/1, p < 0.0001). Interest and duration of the course were rated significantly more positively by HTP students (100.0/95.0% vs. 85.0/70.0%, p < 0.0001). The HTP students were significantly more confident in performing a cystoscopy independently (HTP 43.5% vs. SC 11.5%, p < 0.0001) and significantly claimed more often to have gained interdisciplinary and urological skills during the course (HTP 90.0/96.5% vs. SC 23.1/82.7%, p < 0.0001/p = 0.003). HTP students were also more likely to take the course again (HTP 98.2% vs. SC 59.6%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Modifying endourological teaching towards hands-on teaching resulted in stronger course interest, greater confidence regarding endourologic procedures, and significantly increased urologic knowledge transfer.


Assuntos
Educação de Graduação em Medicina , Estudantes de Medicina , Urologia , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Educação de Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Currículo , Urologia/educação , Competência Clínica
16.
J Endourol ; 36(11): 1444-1451, 2022 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35822547

RESUMO

Objective: To evaluate perioperative parameters, clinical outcomes, and the learning curve of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in surgeons with experience in thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP). Materials and Methods: The learning curves for HoLEP of the first 50 consecutive patients of two surgeons experienced in ThuLEP were analyzed. In addition, demographic parameters, clinical outcomes, and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated. Results: Mean operation time was 70.9 ± 29.7 minutes (standard deviation) (Surgeon 1) and 74.4 ± 35.4 minutes (Surgeon 2), the mean enucleation efficiency was 1.5 ± 0.6 g/min (Surgeon 1) and 1.5 ± 0.7 g/min (Surgeon 2). The hemoglobin loss was 0.9 ± 0.8 and 0.8 ± 0.8 g/dL. For both surgeons, there was a significant learning curve in enucleation efficiency within the first 50 cases (Surgeon 1: p = 0.034, Surgeon 2: p = 0.006, both: p = 0.0003, Spearman's ρ = 0.351). Both surgeons started with an enucleation efficiency of around 1 g/min in their first 10 cases. No significant correlation between hemoglobin loss and experience could be found (p = 0.823, ρ = 0.025). While there was no significant learning curve for morcellation efficiency (p = 0.785, ρ = 0.028), a significant progress was found for one of the two surgeons regarding laser energy efficiency (p = 0.014). The overall incidence of all grade treatment-related AEs was low at 10.0%, and extremely low for significant complications with Clavien-Dindo Grade >II at 1%. Conclusions: In our analysis, switching to HoLEP is uncomplicated and safe for experienced ThuLEP surgeons. The enucleation efficiency was high from the beginning, but a learning curve was present for both surgeons. No learning curve was noticeable in hemoglobin loss and the incidence of complications, both of which were low throughout the study.


Assuntos
Terapia a Laser , Lasers de Estado Sólido , Hiperplasia Prostática , Cirurgiões , Masculino , Humanos , Túlio , Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêutico , Próstata , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Hólmio , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos
18.
Minerva Urol Nephrol ; 74(5): 538-550, 2022 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35274903

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Artificial intelligence (AI) has been successfully applied for automatic tumor detection and grading in histopathological image analysis in urologic oncology. The aim of this review was to assess the applicability of these approaches in image-based oncological outcome prediction. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic literature search was conducted using the databases MEDLINE through PubMed and Web of Science up to April 20, 2021. Studies investigating AI approaches to determine the risk of recurrence, metastasis, or survival directly from H&E-stained tissue sections in prostate, renal cell or urothelial carcinoma were included. Characteristics of the AI approach and performance metrics were extracted and summarized. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the PROBAST tool. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: 16 studies yielding a total of 6658 patients and reporting on 17 outcome predictions were included. Six studies focused on renal cell, six on prostate and three on urothelial carcinoma while one study investigated renal cell and urothelial carcinoma. Handcrafted feature extraction was used in five, a convolutional neural network (CNN) in six and a deep feature extraction in four studies. One study compared a CNN with handcrafted feature extraction. In seven outcome predictions, a multivariable comparison with clinicopathological parameters was reported. Five of them showed statistically significant hazard ratios for the AI's model's-prediction. However, RoB was high in 15 outcome predictions and unclear in two. CONCLUSIONS: The included studies are promising but predominantly early pilot studies, therefore primarily highlighting the potential of AI approaches. Additional well-designed studies are needed to assess the actual clinical applicability.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células de Transição , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Urologia , Inteligência Artificial , Amarelo de Eosina-(YS) , Hematoxilina , Humanos , Masculino
19.
Urologie ; 61(7): 759-766, 2022 Jul.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35262752

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been approved in uro-oncology for a few years. Real-world experience regarding benefits and risks with novel side effects are rare. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective analysis, all patients who received ICI therapy due to metastatic renal cell carcinoma (NCC) or urothelial carcinoma (UCA) were enrolled at two maximum care hospitals in Germany between July 2016 and May 2021. Radiologic response, progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events leading to treatment interruption were collected. Oncologic response was compared to randomized controlled trials. RESULTS: In all, 1185 ICI cycles were administered to 145 patients (111 men [77%] and 34 women [23%]): 64 (44.1 %) patients with NCC and 81 (55.9%) patients with UCA received ICI therapy. Of 141 patients with radiological follow-up, an objective response was observed in 21.3% (n = 13) of patients with NCC and 20.0% (n = 16) with UCA (median duration of response 14.9 months [3.0-51.3]). Median PFS was 5.3 months in patients with NCC and 4.8 months with UCA. ICI-associated adverse events requiring treatment interruption were observed in 17.2% patients with NCC and 20.9% with UCA. These were most commonly renal (5.5%: nephritis) and gastrointestinal (4.8%: colitis, diarrhea) adverse events. Hospitalization was required for 22 (15.1%) patients. CONCLUSION: This real-world experience may support patient-centered consultation in treatment decision-making. Further studies on prognostic factors are needed. Therapy interruptions are frequent and the spectrum of side effects requires interdisciplinary treatment.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Imunológicos , Carcinoma de Células Renais , Carcinoma de Células de Transição , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Neoplasias Renais , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/induzido quimicamente , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Fatores Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Imunoterapia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/induzido quimicamente
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...